I have always been a huge votary of the work from home idea. I have never believed in having office
timings, I have not ever bothered if people came into work or not. So long as
the work got done, none of this should matter, I would argue. I believe that people should be mature enough
to deliver on the responsibilities assigned to them and that managers should know
how to make them accountable.
But alas, that is not how the real world is. It does not
have to be that way, but then that is how it is. Most of our companies work in
a time clock punching world. We live in a world where HR keeps an eye on how
many hours you put in but not whether you did any work during those hours that
you clocked. Much too often to my liking
I run into a colleague in the elevator who would tell me that he had to stay
late to log the hours that HR expected of him. We live in a world where
managers are aware that somebody who clocks the hours may not be delivering but
won’t take action until delivery on the task has been compromised. The blame for
this would be assigned to everything except the manager’s unwillingness to put
in place a system to continuously monitor people for the work they do and not
the hours they keep.
Here at IRIS, a company of which I am the Founder & CEO,
everybody loves the flexibility that I have ensured is never taken away from
them. They love the flexibility of coming to the office when they wish and if
they wish, they love the flexibility of being able to spend their entire
afternoon at the local mall without being questioned. The managers have stopped
criticising me for allowing such flexibility because they too have benefited
greatly from it or maybe they simply know that this is a subject on which I am
inflexible.
There have been huge abuses of the system. A colleague was
granted permission to work from home on the day of his marriage. I learned
about it only because I happened to call him for something at the precise time
the nuptial vows were being exchanged. Yet another colleague spent a week
working from home when she was actually shopping for her wedding. The abuse
that left me wondering whether I should laugh or cry was by a colleague on our
inbound help desk setup for clients was given permission to work from home when
she had exhausted her maternity leave but wanted to be at home for the baby.
When asked how she could work from home given her role, her supervisor blamed
it on my unwillingness to entertain any discussion on limiting flexibility.
He is right, because the only time I veto my colleagues is when colleagues curtail such freedom. But he is wrong, because he I never told him to not set up systems to make her accountable. In the 25 years I have been an entrepreneur, my biggest failure has been to get my colleagues to embrace the idea whole heartedly and make it a success. My colleagues in HR don’t take the initiative to roll it out either, they take refuge in my frequent comment that it is up to the line managers to formulate a framework with HR in a supporting role to help with the execution of the system.
That is really the nub of the matter. Work from home fails because we refuse to even
try and measure performance. It is
uncharted territory. But people like status quo and are simply unwilling to
tread outside their comfort zones. Even
when some people were willing to explore the idea, they are persuaded by
reluctant colleagues who give reasons why it is simply not feasible. I may be
the CEO but my writ clearly does not run on this issue. But I continue to
persevere.
Because I believe that except in manufacturing companies and
services companies where one needs customer facing people, work from home
should be possible in almost all other areas. In fact, given the automation
that is happening around the world, it may be possible to work from home even
in manufacturing companies, with a need to go work only if and when physical
attention is needed. A friend of mine consults for a company with a factory in
Germany which is controlled from a small office in Powai in Mumbai, he tells me
that there are no shop floor workers!!
To make work from home work for the company, managers need
to change, managements need to change, the rule book needs to change. We have to stop looking at employment through
the prism of work hours and work days. In a world where the employee can work
from anywhere and any time, the work leisure divide is set by the employee and
not by the employer. But then it will work only if the employee is mature
enough to understand the significance of the flexibility being accorded by the
organisation.
The approach to compensation has to undergo a radical
transformation. It cannot be a time and material approach to fixing
compensation, it would be ideal instead to try and fix compensation based on an
estimate of the value of saleable output generated by the employee. It gets
tricky when not all output is for immediate sale or when there are people who
are not creating output for sale, these have to be dealt differently. In the
perfect work from home world, the nature of the contract between an employee
and an employee will change.
Many managers hate the idea of allowing their subordinates
the opportunity to work from home because they simply are not used to being
precise in their instructions to their subordinates. I believe that allowing
subordinates to work from home will make a supervisor better, the operations of businesses will
become more efficient. Meetings will be
productive and the respect for each others’ time will increase in tasks that
require collaboration.
Work from home will also need fundamental changes in law. I
remember a visit a PF inspector paid to our offices in our early days. He wanted to know why we don’t take the
attendance register more seriously than we did.
After listening to my spiel on how I believed in giving my colleagues
total freedom to come when they wish and go when they wish and come to office
only if they wish to, he told me that the attendance register is actually a
right of our staff. He told me that the attendance register was not so much
about employers keeping an eye on their staff as it was about the staff having
a record to show that they are employed in the firm.
Above all else, the staff need to recognise that it is
entirely upto them to make work from home a success. Companies need to recognise that a work from
home possibility will do the company a lot of good. Managers need to recognise
that it will make them a lot sharper.
I just hope my managers are listening.